A Clinton on the campaign trail, as well as some dismal economic news, has some folks pining for the 1990s and the alleged "Clinton economy". Look at these facts to get a better perspective:
--The economic boom of the Reagan era was still going strong into the George H. W. Bush years, but toward the end of his term we finally slid into a recession (I wonder whether breaking his "no new taxes" pledge had anything to do with that?). But the recession's recovery was already strong by the time Bill Clinton took office (Bush's last quarter showed over 4% GDP growth). So Bill inherited a good economy.
--Clinton went too radical too quickly (trying to take over the healthcare industry), and the American people spanked him by voting for the 1st Republican Congress in decades during the mid-term elections. This conservative legislature prevented Clinton from enacting any more significant economic policies except for NAFTA, which never would have made it through a Democrat Congress. NAFTA was--and is--great for our economy.
--This Republican Congress forced some conservative economic policy on President Clinton, most notably welfare reform. Bill vetoed it twice, but was subsequently pressured to sign the popular measure during an election year. Hundreds of thousands of people who had turned the welfare safety net into a hammock were forced to find jobs. They became taxpayers, and their new salaries enabled them to spend more, helping the economy.
--The 90s was the decade of the computer. Nearly every business went digital, exponentially increasing productivity and profits, enabling companies to hire and expand. Businesses weren't the only ones buying from Bill Gates--schools, universities, charities, and households around the world bought American-made computers, pumping more dollars into the economy.
--The downturn that supposedly began during W's 1st term actually had been declining since the previous summer. In fact, Bush (and others) saw it then, but when he warned us about it, he was accused of trying to "talk down" the economy. This downturn was accelerated by the fear, destruction, and insecurity brought on by the 9/11 attacks (Why did you slash the military and intelligence budgets, Mr. Clinton? Why did you refuse--twice!--when the Sudanese offered Osama to you on a silver platter?).
So we see that Clinton cannot take credit for the 90's economic good times.
The U.S.A. is, and has been for many decades, one of the most fiscally conservative countries on Earth. Conservative economic policy defined is basically lower taxes and fewer burdensome regulations on businesses. Other nations have more natural resources than we do, but we prosper more because of our Judeo-Christian morality (which is getting weaker all the time) and economic conservatism (also declining). Exit question: Why try to emulate the weaker economies of the world by voting for Democrats?
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Saturday, January 5, 2008
Customer Abuse Awards 2007
The purpose of this post is only to warn the unsuspecting public about dastardly business practices. Based upon my own experiences, here are my nominees for Customer Abuser of the Year 2007:
*3rd Runner-up--World Gym. They require that you give at least 30 days' notice to end your membership. When my daughter and I wanted to quit, we gave written notice more than 30 days early, and they gave us a date on which our membership would end. But they took money from my bank account for another month! When I complained, they refused to refund the cash, but after a big hassle they gave us 30-day passes which I only used three times, because I'm too busy to go--that's why I quit. That bothered us so much that my wife also quit the gym, but they also billed her for an extra month! Obviously it's an intentional way to squeeze one more month's money out of each member. I wonder how many get charged for an extra month without noticing.
*2nd Runner-up--Big O Tire. First, they had my car on the jack for more than an hour, just to install a new tire. Then, when I was finally notified that my car was ready, I stepped out of the store just in time to see their employee "peeling out" in my little Honda. When I complained via e-mail, phone call, and letter, I didn't get even as much as one apology. Lastly, the tire they installed developed a bubble after a few thousand miles and had to be replaced (by a reputable dealer).
*1st Runner-up--Arizona Federal Credit Union. As I was comparing terms of different institutions for my home refinance last September, I saw that AFCU guaranteed for their members that they would beat all other offers or give $500 cash. I didn't think they could beat the offer I had just received, so I carefully followed their instructions to qualify for the $500. I have sent a plethora of faxes, emails, and phone calls their way to prove that I qualify, yet they never even answer. Upon every inquiry, they say they'll get back to me, but never do.
*Winner, Customer Abuser of the Year: the post office. Notice I didn't say U. S. Postal Service--they don't provide sufficient service to qualify for that title. I don't merely write this as a customer, but also as an employee who regularly witnesses the customer abuse.
It's all about the money for the P. O. today. In a fanatical effort to save man-hours, they have prevented employees from providing the service that we once did. Phones ring fifteen times before they're answered. The front window regularly opens eight or ten minutes late. It's common to delay some first-class mail for weeks. They won't hire enough people to get the mail delivered by once-guaranteed 5pm, so we're out until as late as 9pm in some stations. And, because of managerial threats and pressure, we're moving so fast all of the time that we make more mistakes. Congratulations, P. O. You're 2007's big P. U.
*3rd Runner-up--World Gym. They require that you give at least 30 days' notice to end your membership. When my daughter and I wanted to quit, we gave written notice more than 30 days early, and they gave us a date on which our membership would end. But they took money from my bank account for another month! When I complained, they refused to refund the cash, but after a big hassle they gave us 30-day passes which I only used three times, because I'm too busy to go--that's why I quit. That bothered us so much that my wife also quit the gym, but they also billed her for an extra month! Obviously it's an intentional way to squeeze one more month's money out of each member. I wonder how many get charged for an extra month without noticing.
*2nd Runner-up--Big O Tire. First, they had my car on the jack for more than an hour, just to install a new tire. Then, when I was finally notified that my car was ready, I stepped out of the store just in time to see their employee "peeling out" in my little Honda. When I complained via e-mail, phone call, and letter, I didn't get even as much as one apology. Lastly, the tire they installed developed a bubble after a few thousand miles and had to be replaced (by a reputable dealer).
*1st Runner-up--Arizona Federal Credit Union. As I was comparing terms of different institutions for my home refinance last September, I saw that AFCU guaranteed for their members that they would beat all other offers or give $500 cash. I didn't think they could beat the offer I had just received, so I carefully followed their instructions to qualify for the $500. I have sent a plethora of faxes, emails, and phone calls their way to prove that I qualify, yet they never even answer. Upon every inquiry, they say they'll get back to me, but never do.
*Winner, Customer Abuser of the Year: the post office. Notice I didn't say U. S. Postal Service--they don't provide sufficient service to qualify for that title. I don't merely write this as a customer, but also as an employee who regularly witnesses the customer abuse.
It's all about the money for the P. O. today. In a fanatical effort to save man-hours, they have prevented employees from providing the service that we once did. Phones ring fifteen times before they're answered. The front window regularly opens eight or ten minutes late. It's common to delay some first-class mail for weeks. They won't hire enough people to get the mail delivered by once-guaranteed 5pm, so we're out until as late as 9pm in some stations. And, because of managerial threats and pressure, we're moving so fast all of the time that we make more mistakes. Congratulations, P. O. You're 2007's big P. U.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
A Call For An Education Revolution
The New York Times published an error of sorts this week. No, I'm not referring to their loony-left editorial positions. In the Times' "Bestseller List" of published tomes, they did not show the real biggest-selling book. This book outsells everything else, week after week, year after year, century after century. This book has shaped the English language. We quote it or allude to its passages every day. It has impacted many other languages. I think this book has influenced Western Civilization more than anything else. Yet the average school ignores this book.
I can't afford the private schools that give due attention to this banned book, so my children will only learn the dogmas that the establishment permits. And those who can shell out the bucks to send their kids to private schools have to keep paying for tax-funded public schools as well. Anyone (except the most radical of leftists) can see that it's unfair to pay for school twice. And it's not fair for those in poor neighborhoods to be stuck in underachieving schools.
Even though the U.S. spends more per capita on education than any other nation, our kids are regularly surpassed by at least a dozen other countries in science and math test scores.
The solutions: Privatize every school. Vouchers for every child. A bare minimum of government regulation--and that should be local, not federal regulation. Abolish the Department of Education, a money drain which bogs schools down with red tape and squelches innovation. Minimize the influence of the National Education Association (misnomer), which is only interested in accumulating power. The result: the poor will be able to afford good schools. And there will be as many varieties of schools as there of restaurants. If you want to send your child to a school that emphasizes history, you'll be able to find one. Need more language arts and less P.E.? It will be somewhere. And if you happen to be one of those Bible-lovers (gasp!), I'm sure there will be some schools to cater to you (and me).
I can't afford the private schools that give due attention to this banned book, so my children will only learn the dogmas that the establishment permits. And those who can shell out the bucks to send their kids to private schools have to keep paying for tax-funded public schools as well. Anyone (except the most radical of leftists) can see that it's unfair to pay for school twice. And it's not fair for those in poor neighborhoods to be stuck in underachieving schools.
Even though the U.S. spends more per capita on education than any other nation, our kids are regularly surpassed by at least a dozen other countries in science and math test scores.
The solutions: Privatize every school. Vouchers for every child. A bare minimum of government regulation--and that should be local, not federal regulation. Abolish the Department of Education, a money drain which bogs schools down with red tape and squelches innovation. Minimize the influence of the National Education Association (misnomer), which is only interested in accumulating power. The result: the poor will be able to afford good schools. And there will be as many varieties of schools as there of restaurants. If you want to send your child to a school that emphasizes history, you'll be able to find one. Need more language arts and less P.E.? It will be somewhere. And if you happen to be one of those Bible-lovers (gasp!), I'm sure there will be some schools to cater to you (and me).
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Bad or Good?
One of the more odious myths propagated today by the likes of Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins is the belief that religion does more bad than good, and that it is responsible for not much more than war and hatred. This idea first gained notoriety in the late nineteenth century, with philposophers like Fredrich Nietzsche predicting that the increasing popularity of atheism would usher in a new age in the twentieth century. It did...an new age of evil, with more war casualties, more genocide, and more politically motivated killing than the rest of history combined. Atheistic nations like the USSR and Blood-Red China murdered more than fifty million of their own people, as well as aggressively pursuing global conquest. Adolf Hitler*, who was held captive by the doctrines of Nietzsche and Charles Darwin, pulled the world into the worst war ever while murdering millions of Jews. Dictators have turned nations like N. Korea and Cuba into Bible-burning, Christian-torturing prison states. The crimes perpetrated by all of the misguided religionists since the dawn of time put together is a fraction of these godless regimes' wickedness.
Conversely, who are the first to compassionately respond to victims of natural disasters? Who give more sacrificially to the poor than any other group? Who are the most likely to give up successful careers in order to serve the underprivileged full-time? Who are the most likely to adopt one of the world's 143 million orphans? (I could go on and on) Religious people...specifically, the Christians that Hitchens, Dawkins, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler love to hate.
*Hitler made seemingly Christian statements at times, apparently to unite religious leaders behind him. But he was obviously guided in his governance and his lifestyle by Darwin and Nietzsche.
Conversely, who are the first to compassionately respond to victims of natural disasters? Who give more sacrificially to the poor than any other group? Who are the most likely to give up successful careers in order to serve the underprivileged full-time? Who are the most likely to adopt one of the world's 143 million orphans? (I could go on and on) Religious people...specifically, the Christians that Hitchens, Dawkins, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler love to hate.
*Hitler made seemingly Christian statements at times, apparently to unite religious leaders behind him. But he was obviously guided in his governance and his lifestyle by Darwin and Nietzsche.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Help!
I need to find the perfect source of daily news on the internet. I've been going to hotair.com every day for many months, but I'm growing weary of the atheism of their main writer, and the humor is often mean-spirited and occasionally profane. Is there a place out there with up-to-the-minute news, a daily variety of informative or entertaining videos, and commentary from a conservative and/or Christian perspective? If you know of such a site, please leave a comment.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Happy Reformation Day
You won't hear much about this elsewhere with all of the Halloween hooplah going on today, but this is the 490th anniversary of the beginning of freedom of religion, as well as of the transformation of Europe and the restoration of Christianity to its foundational roots. On October 31, 1517, a humble man named Martin Luther nailed a list of 95 complaints on a church door, complaints against the twisted version of Christianity--Dark Ages' Roman Catholicism--that dominated every aspect of European life. Some passerby liked what he read in the document, and he made copies (on that recent invention called the printing press) that would be distibuted from England to Rome. This set off a revolution in theology and government that profoundly affects us today.
Most people, when hearing the name "Martin Luther," would say, "He's the Black civil rights leader who was killed in the 1960s, right?" Dr. King's German namesake did far more to change the world for the better, yet he is so underappreciated. I encourage you to learn more about this flawed but amazing man.
Most people, when hearing the name "Martin Luther," would say, "He's the Black civil rights leader who was killed in the 1960s, right?" Dr. King's German namesake did far more to change the world for the better, yet he is so underappreciated. I encourage you to learn more about this flawed but amazing man.
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Presidential Punditry, Polls, and Primaries
Misconceptions are about to be shot down:
1) Focus on the Family founder James Dobson never said that Fred Thompson is not "Christian enough." He said that in his opinion, many in the religious right would not consider him "Christian enough" to vote for. This and a few other intentional mischaracterizations by the "drive-by media" of Dobson's positions have made him the whipping boy du jour for many naive conservatives and some Christians.
2) Rudy Giuliani is not the inevitable G.O.P. nominee. Now he enjoys the united support of social liberals in his party, while social conservatives are split several ways. Once weaker Republican candidates start dropping out, you'll see a uniting of social conservatives behind one man who will hopefully rocket past Rudy.
3) Conservatives can be just as irrational and mean-spirited as many liberals are. I must confess that this was a shocker to me, because my conservative friends are generally rational and rarely spiteful. I'm kinda new to the blogosphere, and I found that trying to explain points 1) and 2) to some posters on right-wing websites was an exercise in futility. I'm disillusioned. I don't know...maybe some of those hatemongers were liberals in disguise, trying to get us divided. But there seems to be too many half-baked haters in the G.O.P. Talk about Republicans acting like Democrats...
1) Focus on the Family founder James Dobson never said that Fred Thompson is not "Christian enough." He said that in his opinion, many in the religious right would not consider him "Christian enough" to vote for. This and a few other intentional mischaracterizations by the "drive-by media" of Dobson's positions have made him the whipping boy du jour for many naive conservatives and some Christians.
2) Rudy Giuliani is not the inevitable G.O.P. nominee. Now he enjoys the united support of social liberals in his party, while social conservatives are split several ways. Once weaker Republican candidates start dropping out, you'll see a uniting of social conservatives behind one man who will hopefully rocket past Rudy.
3) Conservatives can be just as irrational and mean-spirited as many liberals are. I must confess that this was a shocker to me, because my conservative friends are generally rational and rarely spiteful. I'm kinda new to the blogosphere, and I found that trying to explain points 1) and 2) to some posters on right-wing websites was an exercise in futility. I'm disillusioned. I don't know...maybe some of those hatemongers were liberals in disguise, trying to get us divided. But there seems to be too many half-baked haters in the G.O.P. Talk about Republicans acting like Democrats...
Friday, September 7, 2007
A Hero Gets A Promotion
On 9/5, I went to the two news websites I usually check to see what's going on in the world. While they both paid homage to the talented tenor/disgraceful womanizer who had just passed away, both sites neglected to mention what I consider to be the most important milestone of the day--that D. James Kennedy left this Earth after a long illness, and he is now with his Lord. Kennedy did much more good in his lifetime than not only the singer but just about anyone in the world. He personally led many hundreds of people to a relationship with Jesus Christ, he trained many thousands of people to lead countless others to the Lord, and he convinced multitudes of Christians to get involved in public policy. His radio and TV broadcasts have encouraged the faith of millions for decades. He will be badly missed.
A tribute:
http://65.240.226.104:8080/
A tribute:
http://65.240.226.104:8080/
Friday, August 31, 2007
A Tale Of Two Politicians
As I observe the unraveling of Senator Larry Craig, I am reminded of a certain President of the United States. First, the persistent rumors, then an outrageous adulterous sex scandal with accompanying illegalities, and finally, deny-deny-deny. The similarities end there. Because the aforementioned President was a Democrat, his party and much of the media rallied around him, and he is a hero to them today. Senator Craig is a Republican, so he can probably count his defenders on one hand.
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
Media Misnomers
As someone who calls for such radical policies as the dissolution of that useless behemoth known as the federal Department of Education, as well as legally restoring safety to the most dangerous place in the USA (the mother's womb), the media and culture would call me conservative, not radical. OK, I can live with that. But why are governments like those of Hitler, Mussolini, and Iranian President Ahmadinejad also called either conservative or right-wing? High taxes; severe limits to freedoms of speech, assembly, and the press; gun control; government intrusion into every part of life; nationalization of industries...hardly Reaganesque. Additionally, Hitler and Mussolini were pro-union. And Hitler was pro-abortion. Why are they linked with me as right-wing?
I also object to the symbolic choice of the media to label conservative Republicans "red" and liberal Democrats "blue." In the Revolutionary War, the red-coated British represented much of what liberalism stands for today, and the boys in blue paved the way for those very right-wing documents known as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And Red China is at the left end of the spectrum.
Media misnomers are not limited to politics. Cursing or profanity are referred to as mature language. I've heard children use those words. Are those children more mature than their peers? Quite the opposite is true. It is immature language, because the users:
--don't care if they bother people
--don't have the vocabulary to express themselves properly, and
--don't even use profane words according to what their definitions are.
I also object to the symbolic choice of the media to label conservative Republicans "red" and liberal Democrats "blue." In the Revolutionary War, the red-coated British represented much of what liberalism stands for today, and the boys in blue paved the way for those very right-wing documents known as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And Red China is at the left end of the spectrum.
Media misnomers are not limited to politics. Cursing or profanity are referred to as mature language. I've heard children use those words. Are those children more mature than their peers? Quite the opposite is true. It is immature language, because the users:
--don't care if they bother people
--don't have the vocabulary to express themselves properly, and
--don't even use profane words according to what their definitions are.
Monday, July 30, 2007
Stupid Ingenuity
The oxymoronic title of this post refers to the invention of the alarm clock snooze button, which ranks right up there in its benefit to mankind with submarine screen doors. Friend, if you can afford to sleep a few minutes more, why didn't you set the alarm to sound later? If you can't, you'll either be late, or you'll drive dangerously, or some other unfortunate time-constraint consequence of your snooze addiction will befall you. Additionally, the family members you disturb unnecessarily will likely consider you lazy, irrational, and/or irresponsible.
Saturday, July 7, 2007
The Goracle's Big Concert
--Al Gore, not content to rest on his laurels after having invented the internet, has reinvented himself. His past persona was one of constant self-aggrandizing lies streaming out of his piehole. Now he specializes in hypocrisy.
--Or should I say hip-hop-crisy? Remember Tipper, Gore's wife, and her campaign to clean up popular music via the Parents' Music Resource Center? Today, Big Al is parading a plethora of perverted pop stars in his Universal Concerts To Save Life As We Know It. Even Akon, the ex-con Lord of Lewd Lechers, leaped around Gore's stage. Yes, Akon, the misogynist polygamist rapper who once horribly molested a fifteen-year-old on another stage, in Trinidad. I wonder if he exchanged post-performance hugs with Al and Tipper.
--In Great Britain, the BBC interrupted the concert repeatedly to officially apologize for the filthy language.
--The Times of London estimates that the end result of the many Gore-inspired concerts will be a carbon footprint of 31,500 tons! Stars and their entourages flying, fans driving, lights, amps, and tons of litter, all over the globe! That's OK, because in Reverend Gore's Church of the Convenient Crisis (wherein disciple-scientists earn big government contracts by convincing us that The End Is Near), you don't have to stop polluting, you just have to pay others to stop polluting. That's how Gore justifies his huge un-green mansion and Learjetting lifestyle--he buys carbon "offsets". How fortunate for Big Al that he coincidentally owns stock in a carbon offset firm.
--Al, why are you in the spotlight today? You should be with your son, Al Gore the Third, who was arrested a couple of days ago for driving 100mph with various drugs in his possession...again. Never mind, Al. If you were to go to your son, it wouldn't be to lovingly admonish him to change his ways. It would be to give him a high-five because he was busted while driving a gas/electric hybrid!
--Or should I say hip-hop-crisy? Remember Tipper, Gore's wife, and her campaign to clean up popular music via the Parents' Music Resource Center? Today, Big Al is parading a plethora of perverted pop stars in his Universal Concerts To Save Life As We Know It. Even Akon, the ex-con Lord of Lewd Lechers, leaped around Gore's stage. Yes, Akon, the misogynist polygamist rapper who once horribly molested a fifteen-year-old on another stage, in Trinidad. I wonder if he exchanged post-performance hugs with Al and Tipper.
--In Great Britain, the BBC interrupted the concert repeatedly to officially apologize for the filthy language.
--The Times of London estimates that the end result of the many Gore-inspired concerts will be a carbon footprint of 31,500 tons! Stars and their entourages flying, fans driving, lights, amps, and tons of litter, all over the globe! That's OK, because in Reverend Gore's Church of the Convenient Crisis (wherein disciple-scientists earn big government contracts by convincing us that The End Is Near), you don't have to stop polluting, you just have to pay others to stop polluting. That's how Gore justifies his huge un-green mansion and Learjetting lifestyle--he buys carbon "offsets". How fortunate for Big Al that he coincidentally owns stock in a carbon offset firm.
--Al, why are you in the spotlight today? You should be with your son, Al Gore the Third, who was arrested a couple of days ago for driving 100mph with various drugs in his possession...again. Never mind, Al. If you were to go to your son, it wouldn't be to lovingly admonish him to change his ways. It would be to give him a high-five because he was busted while driving a gas/electric hybrid!
Friday, June 22, 2007
Birthdays
What's the big deal about a birthday? It only marks the anniversary of when an already living, thinking person, with physical senses and emotions, moved a few inches through a birth canal. In my view, it would make more sense to celebrate the day of conception, except that that date is rarely known. Not to mention the awkward, premature conversations with little ones such commemorations would lead to.
As I ponder the entirely uncelebratory passing of the twenty-seventh anniversary of my conversion to Christianity yesterday, I feel kinda deprived, like most people would if their birthdays were unnoticed. But God noticed. As my Heavenly Father, He's the one who gave me my new birth (John 3:3). Hmmm...I wonder if there was a "spiritual birthday" party in Heaven for me?
As I ponder the entirely uncelebratory passing of the twenty-seventh anniversary of my conversion to Christianity yesterday, I feel kinda deprived, like most people would if their birthdays were unnoticed. But God noticed. As my Heavenly Father, He's the one who gave me my new birth (John 3:3). Hmmm...I wonder if there was a "spiritual birthday" party in Heaven for me?
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
D-Day: Armies That Liberate, Not Conquer
On this sixty-third anniversary of D-Day, I would like to teach my younger readers a little about the tremendous significance of the event, and for the rest of us, to relate it to a modern struggle. It was the greatest amphibious assault in history, with tens of thousands of our finest boys storming the beaches of Normandy, running toward the hills that were raining down cannon and machine gun fire upon them. The Nazis had conquered almost all of Europe, but the Allies were trying to get a foothold there in the north of France. Was this massive force invading to conquer? No, they were fighting to free a conquered people. Many thousands gave their lives so that others might be free.
There is a conqueror today who is more vile and more ambitious than Adolf Hitler. Osama Bin Laden may be that, but I'm referring to Satan. God has sent His army--the Church--into all the Earth to fight for the lives of those trodden under by satanic deception and their own sin. We do not fight to conquer, but to liberate. Our weapons are prayer, faith, love, and God's word. Let us remember the courage of the D-Day vets as we also live our lives--and perhaps give our lives--for the cause of this Gospel.
There is a conqueror today who is more vile and more ambitious than Adolf Hitler. Osama Bin Laden may be that, but I'm referring to Satan. God has sent His army--the Church--into all the Earth to fight for the lives of those trodden under by satanic deception and their own sin. We do not fight to conquer, but to liberate. Our weapons are prayer, faith, love, and God's word. Let us remember the courage of the D-Day vets as we also live our lives--and perhaps give our lives--for the cause of this Gospel.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Cowards, Tyrants, and Heroes
That which cowards would abandon, and which tyrants would destroy, United States military veterans have preserved: our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Please thank a veteran today, and pray for the families of those who have died serving our nation. Happy, yet pensive, Memorial Day to you.
Thursday, May 3, 2007
the good ol' USA--NOT a Christian country
Much of our entertainment--movies, TV shows, music, books, magazines, and websites--has awful themes, foul language, and/or sexually provocative imagery. This filth is lapped up by the public like a dog gobbling vomit.
"Akon" is a child-molesting ex-con polygamist misogynist who was a recent guest on American idol, whose pornographic videos are prominent on MTV, who is adored by most music critics, and who has sold many millions of CDs here.
In public, how often do you hear the Lord's names used flippantly or blasphemously, and how often do you hear him praised?
More Americans consult horoscopes or some other occult medium than the Bible every day.
T-shirts here are adorned with rebellious slogans, obscenities, or photos of celebrity perverts, leftist dictators, or dead drug-addict rock stars.
We spend more money on our pets than on charities that help people.
Blinded by hatred, nearly half of Americans think that the President certainly knew (22%) or may have known (22%) about the 9/11 attacks in advance. For Democrats, the figures are 35% and 26%, respectively.
"Akon" is a child-molesting ex-con polygamist misogynist who was a recent guest on American idol, whose pornographic videos are prominent on MTV, who is adored by most music critics, and who has sold many millions of CDs here.
In public, how often do you hear the Lord's names used flippantly or blasphemously, and how often do you hear him praised?
More Americans consult horoscopes or some other occult medium than the Bible every day.
T-shirts here are adorned with rebellious slogans, obscenities, or photos of celebrity perverts, leftist dictators, or dead drug-addict rock stars.
We spend more money on our pets than on charities that help people.
Blinded by hatred, nearly half of Americans think that the President certainly knew (22%) or may have known (22%) about the 9/11 attacks in advance. For Democrats, the figures are 35% and 26%, respectively.
The vast majority of Americans have committed adultery, fornication, or both.
Our government unconstitutionally spends millions of our tax dollars on perverted college courses and left-wing TV/radio networks in every state, and few care.
More than a thousand of our teens get STDs every day.
We've legally killed more an a million babies a year for decades.
Hitler learned a lot about genocide from us: http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html
But as bad as it is here, there are a lot of places with even more evil:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/04/us-troops-discover-bombs-built-into-iraq-girls-school/
Come quickly, Lord Jesus.
Friday, April 20, 2007
Worst US School Violence Ever--1927
I'm baffled. I've been a news junkie with an interest in history for most of my adult life, and I was born in Michigan. How is it that I never heard of the worst school violence ever in the US until a few days ago? Bath, Michigan; May 18, 1927. Most of the 45 killed and 58 injured were young children. Maybe...no, it couldn't be! But, maybe if the Butcher of Bath had used a gun instead of dynamite to visit his evil upon that school, the incident might be common knowledge today.
So the three worst mass murders in US history--at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, the hijacking of planes during 9/11, and the murder of the kids and teachers at the Bath school--all were perpetrated without guns. And privately owned guns are used to prevent more than a million crimes every year. (Just the other day, an elderly lady shot out the tires of a would-be thief's getaway car, and the only reason the media found that newsworthy was that Granny was a former Miss America) V-Tech's Psy-Cho killed people but gave life to the gun-grabbers' cause. So when the politicians pontificate about how you can't be trusted with the right to bear arms, remember: If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
So the three worst mass murders in US history--at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, the hijacking of planes during 9/11, and the murder of the kids and teachers at the Bath school--all were perpetrated without guns. And privately owned guns are used to prevent more than a million crimes every year. (Just the other day, an elderly lady shot out the tires of a would-be thief's getaway car, and the only reason the media found that newsworthy was that Granny was a former Miss America) V-Tech's Psy-Cho killed people but gave life to the gun-grabbers' cause. So when the politicians pontificate about how you can't be trusted with the right to bear arms, remember: If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Random Rants
The average bicyclist in my area rides solely for exercise, not transportation. Why then do they typically spend many hundreds of dollars for aerodynamic clothes and super-lightweight bikes? Wouldn't they get more exercise with a cheap bike, sweatpants, and a t-shirt?
I think the most frequent misuse of the Bible is saying "let him who has no sin throw the first stone" to deflect criticism. Look at the entire passage! (Gospel of John 8:1-12) Jesus was talking about capital punishment--literally stoning someone to death--not verbal correction.
My wife has me wrapped around her little finger. I would do anything to show her I love her. The secret of her power over me? She is always sweet, thoughtful, generous, and submissive, and I have never seen her lose her temper. That, Betty Friedan, is The Feminine Mystique.
When our cat 'Pasko' play-fights with one of our Miniature Pinscher puppies, and I see him wrap those long, sharp teeth around that tiny neck, only to let the pup go so that it can pounce on Pasko again, I think of the Biblical promise that one day "the lion will lie down with the lamb," and all will be at peace.
Memo to Tokyo Rosie of TV's The (Leftist) View--In your zeal to aquit Don Imus because you believe that to fire him would be "a return to Nazi Germany" and "censorship", you obliterate the vast difference between government censorship and private control of what a company or institution allows to be said on its watch. I'm glad my employer doesn't let my coworkers verbally harrass or threaten me. I hope ABC fires you for the outrageous things that you have said. And I hope you find the new life that only Jesus gives.
I know that tailgaters are more interested in getting-from-point-A-to-point-B-quickly-no-matter-what than in learning anything, but let's try an experiment. Maybe, just maybe, if we all would slow down four or five mph each time our bumpers are being shadowed, they might decide that they would be better off backing off. After all, if someone is going to rear-end me, wouldn't it be less dangerous at a lower speed?
Let's say you live in a small town with only two stores. One is owned and run by an upstanding citizen, and the other one has lower prices and treats customers just as well, but you discover it's owned by a wife-beating Al-Qaeda supporter. Would you shop only at the store with higher prices? Then why is it that most of you never participate in boycotts?
I think the most frequent misuse of the Bible is saying "let him who has no sin throw the first stone" to deflect criticism. Look at the entire passage! (Gospel of John 8:1-12) Jesus was talking about capital punishment--literally stoning someone to death--not verbal correction.
My wife has me wrapped around her little finger. I would do anything to show her I love her. The secret of her power over me? She is always sweet, thoughtful, generous, and submissive, and I have never seen her lose her temper. That, Betty Friedan, is The Feminine Mystique.
When our cat 'Pasko' play-fights with one of our Miniature Pinscher puppies, and I see him wrap those long, sharp teeth around that tiny neck, only to let the pup go so that it can pounce on Pasko again, I think of the Biblical promise that one day "the lion will lie down with the lamb," and all will be at peace.
Memo to Tokyo Rosie of TV's The (Leftist) View--In your zeal to aquit Don Imus because you believe that to fire him would be "a return to Nazi Germany" and "censorship", you obliterate the vast difference between government censorship and private control of what a company or institution allows to be said on its watch. I'm glad my employer doesn't let my coworkers verbally harrass or threaten me. I hope ABC fires you for the outrageous things that you have said. And I hope you find the new life that only Jesus gives.
I know that tailgaters are more interested in getting-from-point-A-to-point-B-quickly-no-matter-what than in learning anything, but let's try an experiment. Maybe, just maybe, if we all would slow down four or five mph each time our bumpers are being shadowed, they might decide that they would be better off backing off. After all, if someone is going to rear-end me, wouldn't it be less dangerous at a lower speed?
Let's say you live in a small town with only two stores. One is owned and run by an upstanding citizen, and the other one has lower prices and treats customers just as well, but you discover it's owned by a wife-beating Al-Qaeda supporter. Would you shop only at the store with higher prices? Then why is it that most of you never participate in boycotts?
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
jgapinoy--the most trusted name in blogging...?
An unfortunate consequence of my family's membership in the local gym is that we are subjected to CNN on large screens throughout the joint. I see that they're doing a series called "What Is A Christian?" Since the network puts a graphic on the screen that says, "The Most Trusted Name In News," even though Fox News regularly bodyslams them in the ratings (despite being available in fewer venues), it is obvious that you can't believe every sign or slogan they show us. I found that the title "What Is A Christian?" should have been written, "Why We Oppose Christianity." The first installment that I saw was a story about a pastor & his wife teaching married couples how to enjoy better sex, & how the church publicized the lectures to the community. If the way CNN presented the church's outreach is accurate--you never know--I wouldn't have done it quite that way, but I find no reason to condemn the church. After the story, there was a panel of religious "experts" taking turns criticizing the church's leadership, with no one speaking in defense of the pastor. Not quite "fair and balanced."
Without getting into last night's episode that was at least as hostile to the faith, I'll remind you that CNN was founded by Ted Turner, who has called Christianity "a religion for losers," & Catholics "Jesus Freaks," & pro-lifers "Bozos." Turner is not so mean-spirited to everyone--after once looking gulag-stuffing Soviet leaders "in the eyes," he was eager to defend them--"...they looked like they meant the truth." When asked if he agreed that Christian-torturing Kim Jong Il is evil & despotic, he admitted, "I didn't get to meet him, but he didn't look, in the pictures that I've seen of him on CNN, he didn't look too much different than most other people." http://newsbusters.org/node/8225 Most people look like green-pajamas-clad Elvis impersonators, right? Turner insisted that it can't be so bad in N. Korea, because he "didn't see any" brutality or starvation.
It can't be so bad in the church that was teaching better sex, because "in the pictures I've seen" on CNN, I "didn't see any" brutality or starvation there, either.
Without getting into last night's episode that was at least as hostile to the faith, I'll remind you that CNN was founded by Ted Turner, who has called Christianity "a religion for losers," & Catholics "Jesus Freaks," & pro-lifers "Bozos." Turner is not so mean-spirited to everyone--after once looking gulag-stuffing Soviet leaders "in the eyes," he was eager to defend them--"...they looked like they meant the truth." When asked if he agreed that Christian-torturing Kim Jong Il is evil & despotic, he admitted, "I didn't get to meet him, but he didn't look, in the pictures that I've seen of him on CNN, he didn't look too much different than most other people." http://newsbusters.org/node/8225 Most people look like green-pajamas-clad Elvis impersonators, right? Turner insisted that it can't be so bad in N. Korea, because he "didn't see any" brutality or starvation.
It can't be so bad in the church that was teaching better sex, because "in the pictures I've seen" on CNN, I "didn't see any" brutality or starvation there, either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)