The
New York Times published an error of sorts this week. No, I'm not referring to their loony-left editorial positions. In the Times' "Bestseller List" of published tomes, they did not show the real biggest-selling book. This book outsells everything else, week after week, year after year, century after century. This book has shaped the English language. We quote it or allude to its passages every day. It has impacted many other languages. I think this book has influenced Western Civilization more than anything else. Yet
the average school ignores this book.
I can't afford the private schools that give due attention to this banned book, so my children will only learn the dogmas that the establishment permits. And those who can shell out the bucks to send their kids to private schools have to keep paying for tax-funded public schools as well. Anyone (except the most radical of leftists) can see that it's unfair to pay for school twice. And it's not fair for those in poor neighborhoods to be stuck in underachieving schools.
Even though the U.S. spends more per capita on education than any other nation, our kids are regularly surpassed by at least a dozen other countries in science and math test scores.
The solutions: Privatize every school. Vouchers for every child. A bare minimum of government regulation--and that should be local, not federal regulation. Abolish the Department of Education, a money drain which bogs schools down with red tape and squelches innovation. Minimize the influence of the National Education Association (misnomer), which is only interested in accumulating power. The result: the poor will be able to afford good schools. And there will be as many varieties of schools as there of restaurants. If you want to send your child to a school that emphasizes history, you'll be able to find one. Need more language arts and less P.E.? It will be somewhere. And if you happen to be one of those Bible-lovers (gasp!), I'm sure there will be some schools to cater to you (and me).